Many times club members use their club number and/or membership status when trying to sell their chips or strikes...
The act of displaying this information may go a long way in providing an increased level of comfort for the prospective buyer since the seller is a member of a our organization.
As a result, I believe if a transaction goes badly and the seller believes he was "wronged", the buyer should have the ability to file a complaint against the member. Especially when the club's name was involved in "advertising" the transaction. (I'm not saying only those transactions involving club's name qualify for complaints - just saying that's another reason why club should allow non-members to a file claim).
I'm of the opinion that anyone (club member or not) should have the ability to file a claim against a member. I hope that all claims are handled the same regardless of the membership status of the person filing the claim.
Messages In This Thread
- A comment or two about non-member Claims filing...
- Yes I have a contrary view. Quite simple.
-
Very true...in addition, all 
members are
- ...and I have a quite simple question ~~~
- Jim... those who are anti-CCGTCC ~~~
- Jim, Is there a movement somewhwre to do away with
- Doug, unless I am mistaken, the policy is really..
- Jim, you are correct as there is no formal written
- Even if all five of the BoD mermbers didn't
- Doug, there was a thread at TheChipBoard.com ~~~
- Thanks, I found the thread your talking about.
- Thank you, Doug... I, too, can see (understand) ~~
- What made me feel that the measure stood on a ~~~~
- Doug. Thank you, I agree
- What made me feel that the measure stood on a ~~~~
- John -- I believe that if you were to poll the
- [My error including Archie's name regarding ~~~
- Re: Doug, there was a thread at TheChipBoard.com ~
- Thank you, Doug... I, too, can see (understand) ~~
- Jim, you are correct as there is no formal written
-
- Yes I have a contrary view. Quite simple.
