Thank you Doug, and I will reiterate here...
In Response To: My apologies, John had mentioned the thread and I ()
Steve Bedo's reply post to me was very solid and nice to know.
I see where you have also posted that this should be discussed by the BoD and a position stated following that discussion.
Thank you for addressing this.
Jim
Messages In This Thread
- A comment or two about non-member Claims filing...
- Yes I have a contrary view. Quite simple.
-
Very true...in addition, all 
members are
- ...and I have a quite simple question ~~~
- Jim... those who are anti-CCGTCC ~~~
- Jim, Is there a movement somewhwre to do away with
- Doug, unless I am mistaken, the policy is really..
- Jim, you are correct as there is no formal written
- Doug, not withstanding everything else you...
- My apologies, John had mentioned the thread and I
- Thank you Doug, and I will reiterate here...
- Re: Jim, you are correct as there is no formal wri
- My apologies, John had mentioned the thread and I
- Even if all five of the BoD mermbers didn't
- Doug, not withstanding everything else you...
- Doug, there was a thread at TheChipBoard.com ~~~
- Thanks, I found the thread your talking about.
- Thank you, Doug... I, too, can see (understand) ~~
- What made me feel that the measure stood on a ~~~~
- Doug. Thank you, I agree
- What made me feel that the measure stood on a ~~~~
- John -- I believe that if you were to poll the
- [My error including Archie's name regarding ~~~
- Re: Doug, there was a thread at TheChipBoard.com ~
- Thank you, Doug... I, too, can see (understand) ~~
- Jim, you are correct as there is no formal written
-
- Yes I have a contrary view. Quite simple.
