Re: Not only that Steve ...
In Response To: Not only that Steve ... 
()
() Interesting point Archie.
The ancient secretarial paperwork indicates you instigated it being in the code of ethics in the first place *g*
Messages In This Thread
- A comment or two about non-member Claims filing...
- Yes I have a contrary view. Quite simple.
-
Very true...in addition, all 
members are
- Not only that Steve ...
- Excellent point...we have had a few of those
- Re: Not only that Steve ...
- Archie, with my apologies, but not a valid point..
- Re: Not only that Steve ...
- Excellent point...we have had a few of those
- ...and I have a quite simple question ~~~
- Not only that Steve ...
- Jim... those who are anti-CCGTCC ~~~
- Jim, Is there a movement somewhwre to do away with
- Doug, unless I am mistaken, the policy is really..
- Jim, you are correct as there is no formal written
- Even if all five of the BoD mermbers didn't
- Doug, there was a thread at TheChipBoard.com ~~~
- Thanks, I found the thread your talking about.
- Thank you, Doug... I, too, can see (understand) ~~
- What made me feel that the measure stood on a ~~~~
- Doug. Thank you, I agree
- What made me feel that the measure stood on a ~~~~
- John -- I believe that if you were to poll the
- [My error including Archie's name regarding ~~~
- Re: Doug, there was a thread at TheChipBoard.com ~
- Thank you, Doug... I, too, can see (understand) ~~
- Jim, you are correct as there is no formal written
-
- Yes I have a contrary view. Quite simple.